Annual Symposium · Professional Education

Research Abstracts

Selected institutional abstracts reporting research, quality improvement, educational evaluation and human-factors work accepted for the 2026 symposium.

Program Overview
Intended audienceResearch, clinical, quality and professional attendees
FormatOral abstracts, moderated posters and methods forum
Location2026 Annual Symposium
Responsible officeSymposium Abstract Review Committee

Program purpose

What this pathway is designed to develop.

The abstract program gives developing work a clearly labeled forum. Research, quality improvement, educational evaluation and operational analysis are identified separately so an accepted abstract is not mistaken for a completed peer-reviewed publication.

01

Learning domains.

01

Research reports

Protocol-governed investigations with a defined question, method, oversight status and appropriately bounded conclusion.

02

Quality improvement

Structured local or network learning intended to improve a process, with scope and generalizability stated carefully.

03

Education evaluation

Assessment of learner experience, documentation, simulation or program design without overstating competence.

04

Human factors

Studies of communication, handling, design choice or system interaction grounded in observed user experience.

02

Program structure.

Review process

Submissions are reviewed for clarity, method, oversight category, relevance, responsible reporting and management of confidential or proprietary information.

Acceptance categories

The committee assigns oral, moderated-poster or methods-forum presentation. Format reflects program fit, not a hierarchy of scientific certainty.

Archive status

Accepted abstracts remain AREOLA symposium proceedings. Subsequent reports or publications identify updated methods, results and review status separately.

03

Selected 2026 abstracts.

CL-01
Research report · Clinical Innovation

Patient understanding after first-time digital plate planning

A multicenter evaluation of what patients recalled about options, uncertainty and next steps after a structured planning consultation.

HF-03
Human-factors study · Human Factors

Everyday handling questions in registered interchangeable systems

A thematic analysis of questions documented during early follow-up for third-generation MagnePlate users.

QI-07
Quality improvement · Revision Service

Completeness of prior-system records at revision intake

A network project evaluating a standardized intake checklist for patients with earlier implants or plate systems.

MS-11
Research report · Materials Science

Controlled visual classification of noble-metal surface change

An evaluation of agreement among trained observers using defined surface-language categories under controlled review conditions.

ED-14
Education evaluation · Surgical Education

Multisource feedback in the advanced replacement fellowship

A review of how physician, nursing, design and patient-experience feedback contributed to fellow development plans.

PO-18
Outcomes report · Patient Outcomes

Annual Plate Check participation after care away from home

A national cohort analysis of follow-up participation among patients traveling to a regional or national center.

CD-21
Quality improvement · Clinical Plate Design

Version control in multidisciplinary plate-design records

A process evaluation of design-record clarity before and after introduction of a shared confirmation checkpoint.

RN-24
Education evaluation · Nursing Professional Practice

Teach-back reliability in recovery education simulation

A simulation-based evaluation of how consistently specialty nurses confirmed understanding of general recovery and escalation guidance.

04

Assessment, records and boundaries.

Assessment or record

Presentations receive discussant questions and review for reporting quality; symposium acceptance is not external journal peer review.

Scope boundary

Abstract summaries omit patient-identifying information, proprietary manufacturing details and unsupported claims of safety, superiority or clinical effectiveness.

Curriculum review

Archive finalized after the meeting

AREOLA Academy

Questions about Research Abstracts?

Academy staff can clarify intended audience, program scope, professional verification and participation records.

Professional ResourcesAll Academy Programs